It’s about time for another classic Will Bamber navel-gaze
as I wax fanatical about the albums that I adore, specifically albums that I’ve
always adored, over the greater part
of my music-worshipping life, particularly those I fell in love with as a
dreamy-eyed teenager, and what better place to start than with the most
underrated album from the first band I ever truly loved – the band that revealed to me how music could be so much
more than pop hooks and catchy choruses. Whether I do any more of these is up
in the air, but talking about this particular album has been a long time
coming. It’s the dark, the ambitious, the inimitable, the wild, the soaring,
the tragically cathartic masterpiece that is Pink Floyd’s Animals.
I’m dropping my usual charade of acting like a music
journalist – this blog post is gonna be fast and loose, straight from the
heart, of how and why this album captivated me, continues to floor me with
every listen, and why you shouldn’t risk going your entire life without at
least allowing it a chance to burrow into your soul. It may be cringe, but it’s
nothing but the truth.
Ricky Gervais has been pissing me off recently, which is
disheartening, as I’ve always been a huge fan of the fruits of his now
long-historic golden age. The Office is
a near-masterpiece in my opinion, and Extras was,
if a little mawkish, a self-aware and timely satire. This makes it even more
perplexing that the very societal problems that Ricky Gervais mocked and used as the basis of Extras's morality seem to have rotted from his own memory. Remember how Andy Millman’s character
was transformed by his sudden fame into a thoughtless, self-centred arsehole
and the series closed with him rediscovering his humility? I wonder if the
Ricky Gervais I bear witness to on Twitter nowadays, who spends most of his time reminding everyone how clearly enlightened and subversive he is, would be capable of reaching the same moment of
clarity.
I haven’t talked about anime much in a while, but I found a
good one this year and therefore I thought hey, why not just do a
barely-filtered blog post on all the anime I’ve been watching in general lately?
So here we are.
When
the first series of Rick and Morty came out, I was completely smitten. It hit
all the right notes: dark humour, cosmic horror, interesting speculative ideas.
I liked how it was creative with its position as an animated
sitcom, like with its absurd multiple universes and segments built around
improvised nonsense. I liked how sharp and merciless the comedy was, and how
its episode ideas had this Twilight Zone science-fiction ethos to them. It was
like all our weird Christmases had come at once.
Word
spread, with me doing lots of the spreading, and when the long-awaited second
series arrived, the show was the hottest new thing, riding a hype it well
deserved. I was duly excited – after all, in my experience, the first series of
any show, particularly sitcoms, often suffers from its position as the starting
point, and it’s usually by the second or third series that a show truly finds
its footing, and has greater confidence in what it needs to be. Therefore, I
figured that the next few series of Rick and Morty would be even better than
its impressive beginning.
Hi, I got bored and started making a list (I'm a bit like Liam Neeson that way), so here it is. It's not gonna be a regular blog post in that I'm gonna go into any sort of loquacious detail about why any of these scenes are amazing or anything, I'm just simply throwing them out there so people can watch (some) of them and see if they agree. There's plenty of films I think are great that didn't make the cut, as these are the best singular scenes that I just adore for whatever fucked-up reason.
Also these are mostly off the top of my head and the order's pretty arbitrary until about the top four. And I'm only gonna give them a little bit of a comment, as really, they all mostly speak for themselves. So anyway, here are my TEN favourite scenes from all the movies I've seen so far.
10. Carrie's First Dance
I was thinking putting the completely insane split-screen denouement in here, y'know, as in the scene from Carrie, but then I thought about it and, apart from that being predictable as fuck, this is really the scene that is Carrie's centrepiece; we all know where the film's going, or at least have the feeling it's not going to end well, and this is the film at its happiest point, almost dreamily happy, so sickly happy that it's loaded with tension, especially as the camera starts spinning deliriously around the end. LOVE IT.
I find myself deeply depressed at how horror’s reputation
has been torn to shreds in the mind of the modern moviegoer. Whenever I suggest
watching a horror film to a layman of the genre, they have a tendency to lift
their snooty noses and make very clear to me their opinion on how the horror
film market is a rancid pool of schlocky detritus that only caters to a
demographic of mindless idiots. The problem is, on the whole, they’re generally
bang on the money, especially in this day and age. Horror movies have become so
drearily manufactured, predictable and commercially superficial that people
have practically forgotten how good a really
good horror film can be, and how a well-made piece of horror can burrow
into your psyche and lurk there for weeks, keeping you up at night and
exercising your subconscious like any successful work of art should do. In all
fairness, there’s been a rash of acclaimedhorrorfilms recently that are
starting to fight back against the genre’s PR nosedive, but to me, the last
bold, interesting, divisive but strikingly effective horror film to fire-axe
its way through the door of pop culture is 1999’s The Blair Witch Project.
For all the adoration I have for it, Blair Witch carries with it a fair amount of baggage. For one thing, people blame it for the ‘found
footage’ subgenre of cinematic wankery that followed in its wake, all of which
took the original’s unique and interesting concept and chucked away everything
good about it, believing repeating Blair
Witch’s central premise without any of the craftsmanship would be enough to
keep people interested (which, inexplicably, they were kind of right about).
There are also a number of complaints that the film is ‘boring’, or that
‘nothing happens’ and ‘nothing gets explained’. I like to use whether or not
people identify with any of these statements as a litmus test of their emotional stupidity. See, horror has had a schism lately into two distinct
categories: the modern approach, where much of the ‘horror’ comes from cheap,
startling jump-scares and O.T.T. sadism – mostly enjoyed by children – and then there’s the true horror, frequently categorised as
‘psychological horror’, which affects you slowly, subtly; getting under your
skin rather than shoving entrails in your face. Blair Witch, to me, is a master class in creating something truly haunting, which, believe it or not, was the
original objective of the horror genre before it became the equivalent of
popping a balloon next to someone’s head while they’re falling asleep.
Blair
Witch’s legacy has been overshadowed in popular consciousness by its shrewd
marketing campaign, which created, from our modern perspective, a completely
bewildering word-of-mouth semi-rumour among idiots that the low-budget film was
actual ‘found footage’ documenting the
final moments of genuinely missing people. It’s hard to believe that anyone
would fall for this, but I can only assume this must’ve been due to the
primitive minds of the people of the 1990s, and it was commonly proclaimed that
the film’s terror came entirely from the actual
belief of actual human beings that
what they were seeing was ‘real’, and that this
was the driving force of the film’s ability to scare. To me, this is all
totally irrelevant. Blair Witch isn’t
terrifying because I think what I’m seeing is real, although its realistic
qualities are an important part of its effectiveness – it’s terrifying because
it’s a straight-up well made, original, and more importantly (my favourite word
in the universe): SUBTLE film. No
jump-scares, no blood splatters, no ancient demons named ‘Bagul’; just a
bare-bones production and some brilliantly-executed set-pieces and attention to
detail. Blair Witch is more than its
seminal marketing campaign, more than its timely and original gimmick – it’s a
fucking great film, and it’s probably one of my favourite films ever made,
regardless of how many people look at me every time I say that as if I’ve just
announced that I’m a registered sex offender.
In case you don’t know, the story of the film concerns three
young, twattish film students setting out to make a documentary on a mysterious
figure of local folklore known as the ‘Blair Witch’. They set off into the
woods to grab some incidental footage of a few historical murder scenes before quickly
becoming lost and finding themselves set upon by an unseen supernatural entity that
spends the entire film fucking with them in various ways, pushing them to the
brink of insanity before leading them towards an ambiguously sticky ‘end’. The
reason that this film works is that it’s never clear what the supposed ‘Blair
Witch’ actually is, what it wants, or
how it even operates. It’s not a ghost or a ghoul or a literal ‘witch’. You never
even catch a glimpse of it. This should go without saying, but the less you
explain in a horror film, the better. There’s nothing more frightening than the
unknown, and there’s nothing that turns a horror film flaccid faster than
having someone explain the precise details of what, why and how everything is
happening. Blair Witch takes this to
the next level by explaining absolutely nothing. All there is to go on are
interviews with the locals at the beginning of the film, who waffle, Fight Club-style, about all the million
different rumours they’ve heard, and passing mentions of historical kidnappings
and ritualistic murders. Nobody knows what’s out there in the woods, but these
accounts still linger in the back of your mind. The occasional clue is left as
the story unfolds, and at reaching the point of its weird-ass conclusion, you’re
left to fill in the blanks yourself as to what exactly went down.
Too many horror antagonists are things that are recognisable
to us – ghosts, for instance, or crazed murderers, or aliens. Sure, these
things are inherently ‘scary’, but they’re still familiar. The antagonist of Blair
Witch is far more abstract. It’s more like the characters are at the mercy
of the setting itself, the austere American woodland, so remote and endless
that it begins to feel like the hapless students are trapped in a dream world,
wandering in circles, plagued by an overbearing sense of dread, as things go
from weird to bad to worse. And the best part is how the characters react to
all this; at first they’re bickering with each other, then they’re at each
other’s throats regarding their confidence in each other’s map-reading
abilities, and soon they’re spiralling into terrified hysteria. There’s
something darkly satisfying about watching their miserable descent, night after
night. In fact, the film’s not so much about the ‘Blair Witch’ and its spooky
designs as the psychology of its characters – witnessing their despair, their
hopelessness. The most famous scene of all is Heather’s snot-laden confession to camera, utterly broken, wide-eyed with terror. It’s bare, human fear in the
face of total oblivion. And that’s the beauty of the film, in my opinion. There’s
no tense orchestral score or special effects. Everything about this movie is so
authentically raw. In a world of
slickly-produced, ‘oh-no-don’t-go-in-there’ horror movies, Blair Witch is a breath of fresh air; bleak, horrifying air.
The amateurish veneer of the film hides the creativity that
went into it. The no-name actors were chosen based on their improvisational
skills, ordered in the audition process to react immediately to whatever the
directors threw at them; if they hesitated, they were passed over. They were
given GPS systems and sent into the woods to film everything themselves, having
instructions left for them in milk crates specific to each actor as to what
their motivations were, unbeknownst to the others. The actors, basically, had
very little idea what was in store for them – Michael C. Williams, for
instance, was genuinely frightened by the children’s laughter played to them
from a boombox brought out by the directors. They were intentionally starved
and deprived of sleep. ‘Taco’ was their safe word for when they wanted to speak
out of character. In short, the authenticity of the film was carefully
orchestrated, nearly all of the dialogue was improvised, and there were times
when the characters genuinely had no idea what was going on and were actually
being fucked with by the directors. The fear you witness is, at least in part, real fear. And that’s what gives Blair Witch such an edge, and its
achievement of this is undoubtedly what fuelled the water-cooler bullshit about
its honest-to-god realism. When most people think of horror, they think of
ghouls, vampires and zombies, but Blair
Witch strips away the bullshit clichés and presents you with something
genuinely, bleakly compelling.
Okay, I’ll admit I might've been a little harsh earlier; as much as I adore it, and I do adore
it, The Blair Witch Project may not
be for everyone. If
you aren’t taken in by the soft touches of characterisation, or the slow pace
and the build-up of the first two-thirds of the film, I can see why you might
feel like moaning about it, especially if you’ve heard all the hype about how
pant-wettingly frightening it’s meant to be. But, in my eyes, it’s just
brilliant, and as I said, it’s brilliant because it’s so fucking raw. The creeping finale, especially, is
just so nauseously strange, and best of all, left completely ambiguous, as all
the most effective works of psychological horror should be. It’s the unanswered
questions that keep a movie in your head long after it’s ended. The stripped-down
nature of the film, its lightness on visual impact and spectacle, is undoubtedly
what turns people off from it. It’s no Texas
Chainsaw Massacre. It’s no Saw.
But it is, in my mind, uniquely creepy, gripping, and, having been filmed on a
pitiful $30,000, a testament to the power
of subtlety and suggestion, a reminder that it’s not what you pack into a movie
that makes it great, but what you do with it.
As a Burial fan, I have to admit
that I’ve been brutally teased by the dark, visionary, beauty-weaving
motherfucker for about three years now. The last truly heart-blasting release
that he made was around this time back in the ancient epoch of 2013, Rival Dealer, a cross between an EP and
a religious experience, taking you down to Hell, up to Heaven and back again.
It was more of the same, the same in this case being ‘cathartic genius’, but it
was also a change in direction, and there we all were, cans round our heads,
wondering the same thing: where the bloody hell is he going to go from here?
Since then, there have actually
been a number of Burial appearances, although they’ve been teeny, tiny drops of
this, that and the other. Remember ‘Temple Sleeper’? It was an oldschool braid-flinger decorated with the Burial hallmarks, and part of the problem was that that’s exactly what it felt like; a 1992 cut
picked up from somebody’s cellar with the thinnest layer of that Burial magic
painted over it. A surprise, really, considering his last release practically
pulled you up beyond the stars and blew MDMA dust into the face of God. 'Temple Sleeper' was a drop back down to
Earth, which was a direction it made sense to travel, in many respects, but I
think it left everyone feeling a little ‘egh’, especially now Burial’s been
hyped to the point where everything he does is given the same mad reverence as
a verse of the New Testament.
Then earlier this year (unless I’m
forgetting something), there was ‘Sweetz’, a Burial/Zomby collaboration that I
believed, based on the combination alone, had the potential for true greatness,
maybe even the same chart-topping success amongst narcotic, pretentious
audiophiles as ‘Moth’. But the track was divisively experimental, a real
out-there work of atmosphere and repetition that I understand some people enjoyed, but I wasn’t at all
taken by. To me, the elements were there, as were the few loops and Burial
fingerprints I went along with, but the almost seven-minute study in audial
abstraction didn’t leave me truly satisfied. Once again, maybe I was blinded by
the hype, but I found the release a strange disappointment, leaving my
Burial-balls as painfully big and blue as ever.
And now, we have a new release, a
two-track EP: YOUNG DEATH / NIGHTMARKET.
Cool, nice, I thought; good names, and an actual auteur EP for the first time
since the forgotten days of yore. The first thing I noticed was the shortness
of the tracks; together, they came to about thirteen minutes of pure Burial,
and all I could scream inside was “MORE! MORE!!”, but something always beats
nothing when it comes to being a devout Burial fanboy, and upon listening I was
glad to hear in these two tracks what I always truly hope for in any Burial release: a committal to the audial
personality that made him a genius – you know, the intakes of breath, the zippo
clicks, the track’s pieces bursting into life like rediscovered memories – and an exhibition of bold, new
experimentation.
So, are the tracks any good?
Obviously this is no opus like Rival
Dealer was intended as, and it makes no claims to be. Instead, there are
two very different creations here. The first, ‘Young Death’, is Burial in his
most comfortable territory – out in the rain, with a synth as a blanket against
the cold, and soulful samples guiding you along its roughly-beaten dirt track.
The refrain is uplifting, and typically gorgeous, supported with pieces that
range from subtle arpeggiated blips to the brief but powerful hammering of piano keys. As usual, the track transforms, and its second act is far colder and
mysterious (I have to point out the jarring laugh of the Skull Kid), and brings
you down until what could easily be the ‘Teardrop’ beat exits stage left. It’s
tried-and-true Burial, but it works. If you want to step into an oil
painting and have your heartstrings pulled with all the gentility of a lover’s
spirit, then yeah, ‘Young Death’ is a success.
But what’s really worth talking
about here is the second half; a longer track, ‘Nightmarket’. Immediately, the
sound is radically different – above the clinking background noise, the human sighs, all of
that, is an electronic fluttering of bleeps, like alien waves from outer space –
a rarely heard sound for Burial, or, rather, a sound rarely heard in such a raw,
electronic form; more artificial than his usual organic kind of style. It
arrives and vanishes repeatedly, punctuated in between by segments of distant beauty or
anxious nothingness, and the track just builds and builds, and its refrain
becomes stronger and stronger, the voice turning from indistinct mumblings to
graceful piano-like trills up into proud, aggressive synth stabs, with cinematic
sampling creating a fucking hell of a buzz. There is no drumbeat – it is nonexistent,
or at least it might as well be, and that in itself is a sizeable change of
pace. I found it strangely arresting, and very, very interesting as a new
droplet from heaven that I see in the work of this mysterious bloke and his
weird, creepy tunes.
So is it good? Yes, it’s very good.
Of course it bloody is, and it’s just indescribably delightful to hear new Burial that I actually enjoy and don’t
find myself straining to enjoy just because I’ve latched onto the
name like an entitled little leech. But is it really good? Hmm, well that’s tough to say. It doesn’t break into
your life and rearrange the furniture like anything on Rival Dealer, but it’s unfair to expect that. What I do hope is
that it’s a sign of things to come, something that will meet my unfairly high expectations and beat my heart into a slab of tenderised meat, but in the meantime I guess I’ll give the
verdict as: great if you’re as obsessed with the man as I am, and parts of it,
like the denouement of 'Nightmarket', can still smack you around, but there’s very
little here that really gives your insides a good, solid kicking.